Posted by: boomerangcomesback | September 23, 2014

“BANG!” Go the WTC Weasels

Already going VIRAL, this video sourced from: http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2014/09/new-911-video-ends-debate-wtc7-sound-evidence-for-explosion-should-put-final-stake-in-new-world-orders-heart-2441038.html exposes the FRAUD & CONSPIRACY surrounding 9/11.


Responses

  1. Good post Boomer…
    __________________________________________________________
    –”The investigation cited as evidence the claim that no blast was audible on recordings of the collapse [of WTC-7] and that no blast was reported by witnesses, stating that it would have been audible at a level of 130-140 decibels at a distance of half a mile.”–The conclusion from NIST
    . . . . . . . . . . .
    This is nonsense; this sentence would only be true if restated: ‘At a level of 130-140 decibels AT SOURCE, it would be AUDIBLE at a distance of half a mile.’
    Even being some block or so away the volume of the blast would attenuate significantly. The loudness of dB falls off exponentially by distance.

    “Intensity and Distance
    • Sounds get quieter (less loud) the further you get from their source
    • Easy to see that in a free field, the power per unit area falls with square of
    the distance
    • Or in decibel terms, falls by 6dB every doubling of distance.

    Summary
    • Objective and subjective scale of sound quantity
    • Sound Pressure Level scale (dBSPL)
    – logarithmic ratio scale
    – with a reference at the threshold of hearing
    – which is convenient, standard, and closer to our perceptions of loudness.”
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    It is also the case that dB cannot be measured from a sound recording:

    It is IMPOSSIBLE to measure dB from a sound recording. One can only measure the decibels of a live sound. Anyone that doesn’t get this is simply ignorant of the mechanics of sound recording.
    It is in the nature of any recorded medium, that it is in fact an artifact, it is not the thing itself. This artifact has only the relations to other artifacts contained in the medium the record was made in.

    With a sound recording these relationships are set and cannot be separated. The loudness or dB will then depend solely on the playback mechanism, the VU meter registering the settings on the playback.

    http://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/controlled-demolition-and-the-demise-of-wtc-on-911/#comment-1468

    \\][//

  2. dB’s are not an absolute measurement, it is a ratio compared to a standardised Pressure level.In the case of a recording 0dB is “full scale” (+1.0 to -1.0 on the vertical scale of the track). All signals recorded in digital are usually reference to 0dB, and are therefore negative. Silence is “minus infinite dB”. “Sound Pressure Levels” (SPL) the reference is often taken as 1 watt at 1 meter distance in free space (no echos). How “loud” this is on your recording will depend on the sensitivity of your microphone, the gain (amplification) of the microphone pre-amp, the distance of the microphone from the sound source, and many other factors – there is no direct correlation between the SPL land the level shown in dB.
    There are GNU radio programs that capture the dB live sound levels, frequency and SPL markers.

    This exercise is moot unless we know what the details were. Recording devise dB setting, SPL, echo factor (surrounding buildings) frequency response during and pre collapse. There can be many recordings out there that still remain with data that can be used in a comparative manner to determine this as truth but it requires the details laid out.

    I work with sound daily and use the GNU radio companion to record short wave and HF signals. The real evidence would be someone recording LF to HF frequencies and looking for signature RF at the pre-post collapse. Then the dB audio sounds would be linked to the radio TX used in the demolition which if was the event that occurred, would be a dead right conclusion.

    It would also provide scalar field, SHF microwave and other phenomenon that would confirm, rule out energy directed transmission. The ultimate investigation would have an infrared recording with a analog digital audio recording near ground zero.

    Ground zero

    The evidence is in the hands of the perpetrators. I would bet the farm on a surveillance plane at 20000 ft or more taking part in Vigilant Guardian which was recording the FULL EVAN (EM, Scalar , Visual (IR) and all audio (dB, SPL, Hz) Zero Point Spectroscopy and weightings data and a host of other data.

    We did not coin the nuclear ground zero. They did. An admission and example of the codex and lexicon that the mind controllers introduce into the hosts to resolve the trauma programming vacuum left from a false flag implosion.

    • Your information on recording sound is valid.

      Your assumptions to scalar and nuclear are conjecture and nothing else; a leap of faith.
      \\][//

  3. The Laboratory 🙂

    • WTF is this supposed to prove?
      \\][//

  4. “I would bet the farm on a surveillance plane at 20000 ft or more taking part in Vigilant Guardian..”~Puddy

    Obvious conjecture, a presumption with no proof whatsoever.

    “We did not coin the nuclear ground zero. They did. An admission..”

    They did not coin the term “nuclear ground zero” – “ground zero” is the term used, it is euphemism and metaphor. Reading the “nuclear” aspect into it is indeed YOUR term Puddy.
    \\][//

    • The origins of the term ground zero began with the bombing of Japan The Manhattan Project. Atomic is the reference to the term ground zero. One goes with the other. They coined ground zero, therefore a knowing person would attach nuclear/atomic. Why must we play this game?

      Re: obvious conjecture I thought the the “i’d bet” would have sufficed. You ought to save yourself some keystrokes Rogue.

      The Video is in my lab. I was trying to detect infrared with a hacked modified dig camera and IR transmitter, but it failed. It merely was to show the lab radios and spectrum analyzers/oscilloscope. .

      • “The origins of the term ground zero began with the bombing of Japan The Manhattan Project. Atomic is the reference to the term ground zero. One goes with the other. They coined ground zero, therefore a knowing person would attach nuclear/atomic. Why must we play this game?”~Puddy

        A “knowing person”? WTF? Anyone with any sense knows the origin of the term “ground zero” — but a “knowing person” doesn’t “know” that every time the term “ground zero” is used it implies “nuclear/atomic” that is the way schizophrenics think.

        “Ground Zero of the Next Major Energy Boom – Issue #817
        Wall Street Daily ”

        Read the article above–it has NOTHING to do with nuclear.

        And the reason we “play this game” is because you present your intuitions as though they were facts. No one has come close to proving 9/11 was a nuclear event – every one who pushes this bullshit has the same disingenuous approach – stacking conjecture and presumption atop one another as if it really proved something it clearly doesn’t. THAT is the game, not my pointing out that it is a game.
        \\][//

        • ITS A FACT! They coined it. It refers to a Nuclear event. TRUE! end of the story. You obviously are unable to comprehend and like anything posted regarding 911, you lose the ability to read without drawing erroneous conclusions. Read it again, the whole paragraph and try not to add any lines or words.

          The point was clear that the above are facts. The point was that they were trying to place the event up to the level of trinity Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the minds of sheeple. Where you got the impression I was calling 911 a nuclear event in that paragraph is beyond my ability to determine. It;s a dead end after this.

          • Now it gets to the point that I simply don’t believe you. This latest is plausible deniability.
            Yes, time for me to bug-out. I just don’t buy the BS here anymore.
            \\][//

            • 911 is also the phone number for emergency. I wouldn’t argue the point with you when you use it unless I just wanted to argue. The truth is the undiscovered territory. What you accept as fact may or may not be true. I like those who throw it out after reading the so called facts and fiction and allow the experiment to break these controls.

              I forgot what philosopher you moniker there but he must have been very restricted on thought and theory and accepted the mentoring of Aristotle and Plato without question. Take care and my best to Veritable.

      • Crawford Kilian @Crof · 1 day ago
        Ground zero in Guinea: the #Ebola outbreak smoulders – undetected – for more than 3 months bit.ly/1Dw8L8G h/t

        ground zero
        n.
        1. The target of a projectile, such as a missile or bomb.
        2. The site directly below, directly above, or at the point of detonation of a nuclear weapon.
        3. The center of rapid or intense development or change: “The neighborhood scarcely existed five years ago, but today it is the ground zero from which designer shops and restaurants radiate” (Robert Clark).
        4. The starting point or most basic level: My client didn’t like my preliminary designs, so I returned to ground zero.
        The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
        . . . . . . .
        ground zero
        n.
        1. The target of a projectile, such as a missile or bomb.
        2. The site directly below, directly above, or at the point of detonation of a nuclear weapon.
        3. The center of rapid or intense development or change: “The neighborhood scarcely existed five years ago, but today it is the ground zero from which designer shops and restaurants radiate” (Robert Clark).
        4. The starting point or most basic level: My client didn’t like my preliminary designs, so I returned to ground zero.
        The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
        ____________________
        The candid world admits that the term “ground zero” is not exclusively nuclear. Why won’t you?
        Never mind, the question is rhetorical. I know why, because you cannot admit to honest criticism.

        So I will leave you to your yes men and sycophants.
        \\][//

        • “So I will leave you to your yes men and sycophants”.

          Your deprecations are so flatulent and unnecessary. Pretty much your signature as everyone witnesses.

          What do you suppose readers would say about your incre-mental contortions?

  5. The President attends a meeting of the Open Government Partnership (behind closed doors)

    The President chairs United Nations Security Council summit on foreign terrorist fighters. (the truth is expected to be tabled)

    The President attends a luncheon hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon ( baked baby prawns, baked baby alaskan and a nice montrachet)

    • *hypocrite* — somebody feigning high principles

      “somebody who pretends to have admirable principles, beliefs, or feelings but behaves otherwise”.

      These are the kinds of bot flies plaguing mankind everywhere. Notice the plague of them acting in Neocon unison?

  6. https://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2011/05/11/aumf-permanent-war-without-limits/

    AUMF – Permanent war without limits
    posted by: Puddy Dunne | May 11, 2011

    This monumental legislation–with a large-scale and practically irrevocable delegation of war power from Congress to the President–could commit the United States to a worldwide war without clear enemies, without any geographical boundaries (the use of military force within the United States could be permitted), and without any boundary relating to time or specific objective to be achieved. Unlike the AUMF that authorized the Afghanistan War and the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, the proposed new Declaration of War does not cite any specific harm, such as the 9/11 attacks, or specific threat of harm to the United States. It appears to be stating that the United States is at war wherever terrorism suspects reside, regardless of whether there is any danger to the United States.

    http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/Coalition_Memo_to_the_House_Committee_on_Armed_Services_Regarding_a_Proposed_Declaration_of_War.pdf
    http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=a_wider_war_on_terror
    http://www.qando.net/?tag=aumf
    http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=a_wider_war_on_terror
    http://www.aclu.org/new-authorization-worldwide-war-without-end

    _______________________

    OBOMBA SOETORO was change “Regime Change. Bushwhacked Al-CIAda to OBOMBA ISIS.

    Regime change

    AUMF created the perpetual ‘legal’ war. Assume they had already mapped out Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Bahrain, Sudan ……..

    Listen to the Pentagrammers IMC goons talking about the “long haul” It’s chilling as they speak while oozing in their trousers. We are so screwed and so many people are going to exit this world..

  7. NWO Orgasm

    [The name “Khorasan” is derived from Middle Persian khor (meaning “sun”) and asan (or ayan literally meaning “to come” or “coming” or “about to come”), ]

    http://balkhandshambhala.blogspot.com/2012/11/balkh-khorasan.html

  8. The “Regime” and Their Fellow Profiteers cannot defend against this accusation and Their motives which are Obvious to Everyone.

    • Well experienced in the “Zbig – Kiss” formula for Global Dominance. The Committee’s greasy fingerprints are on South America like a UN pedophile on innocent victims.

      Regime change started in the NAU. Evo knows is from his father days and most recently the hit on Chavez. The plans that Libya had for Africom were the same as Chave had in the Southcom.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: