Posted by: Puddy Dunne | September 20, 2013

29 Palms, Colorado 100 year floods, HAARP and MK-Ultra – Redacted

cropped-cotonatootan.jpg

From: Tim White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 1:35 PM
To:Puddydunne
Subject: Re: THE ENDGAME PLAN…WHEN MARTIAL LAW COMES…DD
Form 3206/QUESTION # 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT AMERICANS’ ?

…and NO this was NOT
the KGB Telefon at work but IN FACT the CIA/NSA which is a OPPOSITE of the US NAVY- specifically ONI…FACTION against FACTION in the ESOteric SHADOW
GOVERNMENT…

From: Puddydunne
<XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
To: ‘Tim White’
<XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:54:31
PM
Subject: RE: THE ENDGAME
PLAN…WHEN MARTIAL LAW COMES…DD Form 3206/QUESTION # 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT
AMERICANS’ ?

–>

Timely after the Navy yard.  Is this for posting (minus the email
addresses?)  Do you have an update to the Bases where these Monarch Delta
triggers are groomed?
I proposed this was KGB telefon assassin, Mr Aaron Alexi.  What’s your take on this Tim?
From: Tim White
[mailto:XXXXXXXXXXXXXX]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 4:33
PM
To: Captain Puddy Dunne;
Dane Phillips/BATTLEHYMN.COM
Cc: William R Lyne/Author of PENTAGON
ALIENS; Celerino Castillo III/POWDERBURNS.ORG
Subject: THE ENDGAME PLAN…WHEN MARTIAL
LAW COMES…DD Form 3206/QUESTION # 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT AMERICANS’?
—–
Forwarded Message —–
From: Tim White
<
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
To: XXXXXXXXOSS.NET
<
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>; XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
<
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:09:44
PM
Subject: WHEN MARTIAL LAW
COMES…DD Form 3206/QUESTION # 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT AMERICANS’?

From: Tim White
<
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Subject: WHEN MARTIAL LAW COMES…DD
Form 3206/QUESTION # 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT AMERICANS’ ?
To: XXXXXXXXX” <
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Received: Sunday, July 1,
2012, 4:54 PM

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
QUESTION
# 46 – ‘WILL YOU SHOOT
AMERICANS’?
From:
Tim White
<
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Subject: Re:
THE COMBAT ARMS SURVEY…WILL YOU SHOOT AMERICANS
?
To: “Craig Roberts”
Received:
Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:13
AM
well here is the results
of that “survey” given not only at
Twenty Nine Palms – but ALL bases where any type
of “SPECIAL FORCES” or “FIRST STRIKE”
combat units were based,this included not only Marines but SEAL
TEAMS,RANGERS,GREEN BERETS,DELTA FORCE,select
AIRBORNE units,USAF
AIR COMMANDOS…approximately 80 % plus FLAT
STATED–NO !…approximately 5-10 % gave
MAYBE…and the remaining 10 % answered in the
AFFIRMATIVE…. those who said YES were
IMMEDIATELY re-assigned into “certain training
units” for “further training” (read MKULTRA
PROGRAMMING of the DELTA
kind)… personnel from these
units were/are used in the PENTAGON funded
program known as the NATIONAL GUARD STATE
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM which
came into being in 1993…also known as PARTNERSHIP FOR
PEACE…this “program” partners State National
Guard units with the military forces of other
countries–at this time
there are now 43 States Guard units cross
trained with military units of 50
countries…one of the main bases if not THE
main base used for these cross training
“excercises” is CAMP GUERNSEY in S/E Wyoming
…I have spoken to several people who have seen
LARGE contingents of FOREIGN troops at this
base and this included troops from The PEOPLES
LIBERATION ARMY…that’s CHINESE
folks….RUSSIAN units also seen at
Camp Guernsey …the 10 % AFFIRMATIVE “personnel”
also went into FEMA units and are also now
firmly imbedded in “regular” combat units of all
military branches with MUCH
combat experience in IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN and those
units are under the control of NORTHERN COMMAND
headquartered in
Colorado Springs …NORTHCOM is the
“military teeth” of HOMELAND SECURITY….now
there is an initial particular unit of
approximately 6,000 troops
that has been re-assigned directly from Iraq and under the
control of NORTHCOM with the mandate to “patrol
the streets of U.S. cities when and where needed”…..so much for
POSSE
COMITATUS…
Tim
White
— On Sat, 2/7/09, Craig
Roberts <XXXXXXXXXXXX>

wrote:
From:
Craig Roberts
<
XXXXXXXXXXXX>
Subject:
Re: THE COMBAT ARMS SURVEY…WILL YOU SHOOT
AMERICANS ?
To: XXXXXXXXXX
Date:
Saturday, February 7, 2009, 7:57
AM
The
results of this old survey scared the Commie
Klintons to death. The vast majority of Marines,
especially seasoned vets, said NO.
They would not shoot
at US citizens. This is one of the deciding
factors to utilize foreign troops “to police our
streets in case of national
emergency.”That plan
is still on the shelf and ready. When the
balloon goes up here, expect blue helmets to
appear.

CR


—– Original Message
—–
From:
Tim White
To:
John Caylor ; Darlene
Fitzgerald ; David Hawkins ;
Field McConnell
Sent:
Saturday, February 07, 2009 1:53
AM
Subject:
THE COMBAT ARMS SURVEY…WILL YOU SHOOT
AMERICANS
The timing on this “survey” is certainly much MORE than
just “suspicious”…..this “survey” is actually a
DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE(DOD)
document and comes exactly ONE WEEK
after COMMUNIST TRAITOR Bill Clinton signed
PRESIDENTIAL DECISION DIRECTIVE 25,
on May 3,1994,known more as PDD-25 and it is IMPOSSIBLE
to get a complete copy of this ILLEGAL and
TREASONOUS order…
turns over the TOTAL CONTROL of the United States
Military…ALL the U.S. Military…to the UNITED
NATIONS. It is this FACT that the
well known member of the U.S. Army in Germany ,Michael
New,REFUSED to wear UN BLUE and REFUSED to obey
ILLEGAL ORDERS
given by UN commanders. Of course,Michael New was court
martialed by the COMPLICIT TRAITOROUS OFFICERS who
are in total LOCK STEP with this OUTRAGEOUS threat to the UNITED
STATES and all it’s Citizens. I colorized this
document to show the “increasing
UN BLUE” in every question asked.


Tim
White , Viet Nam
Vet(USAF)
Concerned
Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower


DD
Form 3206 (Rev 2/96)
JOINT
SERVICES TRAINING COMBAT ARMS
SURVEY
link


COMBAT
ARMS SURVEY
QUESTION
# 46

“I
Would Fire Upon U.S.
Citizens…”

The RESISTER has
confirmed that US Navy SEAL
platoons,
including SEAL Team Six, Marine combat
veterans
stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA, and Marine
basic
trainees at Camp Pendelton , CA , have been
administered
a
questionnaire asking, among other things, if
they would “…fire upon US citizens who refuse
or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the
US
government.”

The
questionnaire was first administered to
operators
by
the commanders of SEAL Team Six on 15 September
1993, then subsequently to the remaining SEAL
platoons throughout September and October.
Rumors began circulating in November that US
Army DELTA operators were given the same or
similar questionnaire. The SF Underground had
been aware of the questionnaire since late
September but our observers had been unable to
secure a copy or confirm other than its
substance consisted of questions pertaining to
the subordination of the US Military to the UN
and confiscation of the firearms of US citizens.
In early January, 1994, we obtained a copy of
the questionnaire from one of our DOD
sympathizers but lacking corroboration we ran
the story in Vol.I, No.1 of The RESISTER as a
rumor.
On January 22, 1994, one of our
observers copied a chilling message off the
Internet from Petty Officer 2nd Class W. Kelly,
US Navy Special Warfare Team Six, to D. Hawkins,
Re: Gun Confiscation. Kelly began by stating
that the questionnaire was “…to find out if we
would follow the orders of commanding officers
without question.” (Kelly omitted the fact that
the questionnaire assumes “commanding officers”
gives equal authority to UN officers commanding
US forces.) Kelly continued; “If you wish to
find out how I answered I said yes I would fire
and kill all persons attempting to resist…we
aren’t around to be the good guys.” Remember,
Kelly is referring to American
civilians.In February, 1994, MODERN GUN
magazine ran a story on the elusive
questionnaire which was subsequently circulated
by various patriotic citizens groups. Then, on
10 May, 1994, the questionnaire was administered
to Marine Desert Storm veterans at Twenty-Nine
Palms, CA. A Marine smuggled a copy of the
questionnaire out of the testing center and
mailed it on 15 May, 1994, with a cover letter,
to the editor of THE NEW AMERICAN, which ran the
story in their July 11, 1994, issue. THE NEW
AMERICAN quotes the Marine’s impression that the
questionnaire “was just research for this (Navy)
commander’s degree.” The RESISTER obtained a
copy of the Marine’s letter, which actually
states: “A Navy Commander came before us and
said he was working on his masters degree and he
was writing a paper about giving up our
military’s sovereignty to the United Nations
Secretary
General
.”The
official DOD lie surrounding the questionnaire
entitled “Combat Arms Survey,” supports that of
the Navy Commander. Significantly, the Combat
Arms Survey was first given at the time
Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25 was
being prepared. The RESISTER’s correspondent in
the Pentagon staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
confirms that PDD 25 surrenders control of the
U.S. military to the United Nations.(A
cursory survey of articles written by MACOM
commanders and staff members in official
military journals for the past year reveals a
universal acceptance of U.N. control of the
American military.)The RESISTER has been
eliciting responses to the questionnaire for the
past year. Frighteningly, among service members
with less than 10 years of service, 63% agree or
strongly agree with question # 46: “I would fire
upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S.
government.”Among new recruits almost
90% give the response: “If it’s the law and they
order me to do it I guess it’s okay.” Our
federally controlled public schools have done
their job.Of those with more than 15
years of service, 87% replied “disagree” or
“strongly disagree.” Responses by members of the
Special Forces Underground were unprintable;
basically, there will not be many officers who
give that order more than once.

The
RESISTER has enclosed a copy of the Combat Arms
Survey with this issue. As you read it pay
particular attention to the qualifiers and their
relation to recent articles in the official
publications of the Department of Defense, the
civilian media, and the policies of the federal
government. *

[ Editorial Note The
enclosed Combat Arms Survey is a true and
accurate reproduction of the contents of the
questionnaire. We altered the format to
accommodate the The RESISTER’s layout. THE
EDITOR ]

<————————————————–>

COMBAT
ARMS SURVEY

This
questionnaire is to gather data concerning the
attitudes of combat trained personnel with
regards to nontraditional missions. All of your
responses are confidential. Write your answers
directly on the questionnaire form.
In
Part II, place an “X” in the space provided for
your response
.
Part
I. Demographics
1.
What service are you in?
2. What is your pay
grade? (e.g. E-7, O-7)
3. What is your MOS
code and description?
4. What is your highest
level of education in years?
5. How many
months did you serve in Operation Desert
Storm/Desert Shield?
6. How many months did
you serve in Somalia ?
7. What state or
country did you primarily reside in during
childhood?
Part II. Attitudes
Do you
feel that U.S. Combat troops should be used
within the United States for any of the
following missions?8. Drug
enforcementStrongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No
opinion ( )9. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No
opinion ( )10. Security at national
events (e.g. Olympic Games, Super
Bowl)Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( )
Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )

11. Environmental disaster
clean-up

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )

12. Substitute teachers in public
schools

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )

13. Community assistance programs (e.g.
landscaping, environmental clean-up, road
repair, animal control)

Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )

No opinion ( )

14. Federal and state
prison guards

Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

15. National emergency police
force

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( )
Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )

16. Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the FBI
or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(B.A.T.F.)

Strongly disagree( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

17. Border patrol (e.g. prevention
of illegal aliens into U.S.
territory)

Strongly disagree( ) Disagree
( ) Agree( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops
under U.S. command should be used in other
countries for and of the following United
Nations
missions?

18. Drug
enforcement

Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

19. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)

Strongly disagree( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

20. Environmental disaster
clean-up

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

21. Peace keeping

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

22. Nation
building (Reconstruct civil government, develop
public school system, develop or improve public
transportation system, etc.)

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

23.
Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical
supplies, temporary housing, and
clothing)

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops
should be used in other countries, under command
of non-U.S. officers appointed by the United
Nations
for any of the following
missions?

24. Drug
enforcement

Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

25. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)

Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

26. Environmental disaster
clean-up

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

27. Peace keeping

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

28. Nation
building (Reconstruct civil government, develop
public school system, develop or improve public
transportation system, etc.)

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

29.
Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical
supplies, temporary housing, and
clothing)

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

30. Police action (e.g. Korea ,
Vietnam , but serving under non-U.S.
officers)

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

Consider the following
statements:

31. The U.S. runs a field
training exercise. U
N
combat troops should be allowed
to serve in U.S. combat units during these
exercises under U.S. command and
control.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

32. The United
Nations
runs a field training
exercise. U.S. combat troops under U.S. command
and control should serve in U
N
combat units during these
exercises.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

33. The United
Nations
runs a field training
exercise. U.S. combat troops should serve under
U
N
command and control in U
N
during these
exercises.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )

34. U.S. combat troops should
participate in U
N
missions as long as the U.S. has
full command and control.

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

35. U.S.
combat troops should participate in U
N
missions under United
Nations
command and
control.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

36. U.S. combat troops should be
commanded by U
N
officers and non-commissioned
(NCOs) at battalion and company levels while
performing U N
missions.

Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )

No opinion ( )

37. It would make no
difference to me to have U
N
soldiers as members of my team.
(e.g. fire team, squad, platoon)

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

38. It
would make no difference to me to take orders
from a U
N
company
commander.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

39. I feel the President of the United
States has the authority to pass his
responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the
U
N
Secretary
General.

Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)

40. I feel there is no conflict
between my oath of office and serving as a U
N
soldier.

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

41. I feel
my unit’s combat effectiveness would not be
affected by performing humanitarian missions for
the United
Nations
.

Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree (
)
No opinion ( )

42. I feel a
designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should
be permanently assigned to the command and
control of the United
Nations
.

Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )

No opinion ( )

43. I would be
willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S.
combat unit under a U
N
commander.

Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )

44. I would
like U
N
member countries, including the
U.S. , to the U
N
all the soldiers necessary to
maintain world peace.

Strongly disagree (
) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )

No opinion ( )

45. I would swear to
the following code:


I am a
United
Nations
fighting person.

I
serve in the forces which maintain
world
peace and every nation’s way of life.
I
am prepared to give my life in their
defense.


Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
QUESTION
#
46
The
U.S. government declares a ban
on
the possession, sale, transportation,
and
transfer of all non-sporting firearms.
A
thirty (30) day amnesty period
is
permitted for these firearms
to
be turned over the local authorities.
At
the end of this period,
a
number of citizen groups refuse
to
turn over their
firearms.

Consider
the following
statement:

I
would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or
resist confiscation of firearms banned by the
U.S.
government.

Strongly
disagree

( X )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )

End
Note


Our civilian readers may

be wondering

why the Combat
Arms Survey

was circulated so
heavily within the

Department
of the Navy

The reason is simple

the US Navy

is not subject to

USC
Title 10 Posse Comitatus

prohibitions against using

federal military forces

for domestic
law enforcement

This includes the

US
Marine
Corps

Just thought you would like to know


THE
STAFF

[Resistor,
Ed.]
==========================================================================================================================
NATO
in COLORADO

CLICKON
the STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM under where it’s
written “EXTERNAL LINKS” at the very bottom of
this WIKIPEDIA article to get
extensive
files/photos/information regarding each of these
so-called “partnerships”….on October 8-9,2003 –
there was a meeting of the 27 NATO
Defense
Ministers and the PENTAGON brass led by DONALD
RUMSFELD and PAUL WOLFOWITZ – along with 100’s of
the top Generals and
Admirals
and their attending Colonels and Captains of the
US Military and the RUSSIAN military also at the
World famous 5 Star BROADMOOR
Resort
in Colorado Springs …there was a 2
blocks-in-all-directions area cordoned off by
BLACK UNIFORMED-with-NO-insignia-JACK-BOOTED
THUGS
who kept local residents from leaving or returning
to their OWN HOMES without EXTENSIVE scrutiny by
these THUGS – residents were
being
harrassed and accosted as soon as they left their
own driveways….extensive links and photos of all
the top NATO/military participants can
be
found at this URL
at
this Broadmoor meeting – the admittance into NATO
of the last 7 of the “former Soviet Bloc” nations
occured as well as new alliance agreements were
entered
into – during this same meeting was a gathering of
all the 27 NATO ministers and Generals/Admirals at
SCHRIEVER AFB which is several miles
East
of PETERSON AFB where the headquarters of NORTHCOM
is in a new deep underground facility–this new
headquarters came online in November
of
2002 and resulted in the so-called “mothballing”
of the NORAD facility that is built deep into
CHEYENNE Mtn 2.5 miles straight South from the
Broadmoor….
at
Schriever AFB is THE SPACE WARFARE CENTER and THE
NATIONAL INTEGRATION CENTER and all the 24 GPS
satellites are controlled from
Schriever
AFB as well…at this gathering,the NATO ministers
were treated to a “technology demonstration” of
the HAARP/”STAR WARS” systems which
is
perfected TESLA SCALAR ELECTRO- MAGNETICS
TECHNOLOGY which is embodied with the HAARP 100
Gigawatt Microwave 42 acre antenna
field
at GAKONA Alaska which is MILITARILY controlled
from Schriever AFB and SCIENTIFICALLY controlled
from the NATIONAL OCEANIC and
ATMOSPHERIC
AGENCY(NOAA) labs in Boulder Colorado …I was
intently watching on this day the skies over
Colorado Springs/Denver/Boulder and
1,000’s
of surrounding square miles from my viewpoint in
S/E Denver skies were HEAVILY CHEMTRAIL sprayed by
at least 300 plus
aircraft/”sorties”
which
were crossing at every point of the compass and at
similar high altitudes,turned the beautiful blue
skies earlier that morning to a translucent milky
white/gray
haze in a matter of 2-3 hours…the full
utilization of HAARP is dependant on the METALLIC
IONS of the numerous metals found which are
contained
in the Chemtrails for CONDUCTIVITY of the
EM/MICROWAVE radiation that the HAARP facility
pumps into the upper
Ionosphere…
the
best and very extensive website to explain all of
this is www.carnicom.com
..of these metallic ions,the 2 most widely used
are ALUMINUM and
BARIUM…both
HIGHLY TOXIC to human
health…
Tim
White , Viet Nam
Vet(USAF)
Concerned
Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower

STATE
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

The National Guard
State Partnership Program (SPP) was established
in 1993 in response

to the radically
changed political-military situation following
the collapse of Communism

and the disintegration
of the Soviet
Union
.

The program links U.S. states with
partner countries for the purpose of supporting
the security

cooperation objectives
of the Combatant Commander. The program’s goals
reflect an evolving

international affairs
mission for the National Guard
using the unique civil-military nature of the

Guard to interact with
both active and reserve forces of foreign
countries. The State Partners

actively participate
in a host of engagement activities ranging from
bilateral familiarization

and could lead to
training exercises opportunities,
fellowship-style internships, and civic leader

visits and medical
events. All activities are coordinated through
the Theater Combatant

Commander and the US
Ambassadors’ country teams, and other agencies
as appropriate,

to ensure that
National Guard support is tailored to meet both
US and country
objectives.

The value of the SPP
is its ability to focus the attention of a small
part of the Department of
Defense

(DoD)—a State National
Guard—with a single country or region in support
of US Government policies.

This concentrated
focus allows for the development of long term
personal relationships and a

mechanism to catalyze
support from outside the DoD which otherwise
would not occur but

nevertheless
complements US policy. The optimum SPP
partnership is one in which: the Host Nation

professes genuine
interest in Partnership; US and Theater
engagement objectives are satisfied;

the Force Protection
risk is acceptable; a minimum of additional
resources is required to execute

engagement; and
National Guard core engagement competencies,
particularly military support to

civil authority
(MSCA), and national defense are heavily
incorporated.Today, 43 U.S. states,

two territories, and
the District of Columbia are partnered with 50
countries around the
world.

Partnerships

Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Partnership_Program

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Stop NATO is an
international email news list that examines,
from an adversarial position, the expansion of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) and affilated and
allied military blocs into and throughout
Europe, the Mediterranean, the Caucasus, Central
and South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific, Africa
, the so-called Greater Middle East and beyond.
NATO is the first attempt in history to
establish an aggressive global military
formation, one which currently includes a third of the nations of the
world either as members or partners, has members
and partners on five continents and has
conducted active operations on four, with the
potential to expand its reach into the remaining
two where it has not yet officially
intruded itself. The list provides current and unique information on
reports, developments, trends and analysis,
usually from sources in the affected
areas and regions, not obtainable from commercial news and other
outlets. Its focus is on information and the
analysis thereof and discourages
inordinate discussion of local partisan politics and abstruse polemics.
Stop NATO’s orientation is anti-militarist,
international and internationalist.
Its purpose is to document, anticipate, expose and
oppose ongoing efforts to expand global
militarization, including the deployment of
advanced, potential first strike
missile systems throughout the world and in
space.
Rick Rozoff can be contacted at: XXXXXXXXXStop
NATO articles posted at: http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/
==================================================================================================

REPEAT AFTER
ME !…”’ I WILL NOT SHOOT AMERICANS !
”’

AGAIN
!…”’ I WILL NOT SHOOT AMERICANS….SIR !
”’

“They that can give up
essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.” –
Benjamin Franklin
Former US soldier who
refused to wear the United Nations uniform.
Chronology, links to
related legislation and court documents,
articles, and related
links.
http://www.mikenew.com/ –
Cached
Update
November
2008
ISCAP
The Interagency Security
Classification Appeals Panel

(ISCAP) is that agency of the Executive Branch
of the US government in
charge of maintaining the proper level of
classification on government documents. It is
located in the National Archives
Building in the District
of Columbia . President Ronald Reagan created
(by Executive Order) this department for the
specific purpose of allowing a citizen,
any citizen, to request
a review of classified documents, with a view
toward declassification and release to the
public. This was a step in the direction of more
open government.
President William Clinton saw the immediate
threat of this department to his own barrage of
secret executive orders, so he modified the
terms
to force citizens to
wait ten years (until he was long out of office)
before they could challenge a classified
document. This was a step in the direction of
more secret
and more tyrannical
government, in our opinion. In 1993, President
Clinton issued an executive order which he
styled Presidential
Decision Directive#25
Continued….
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
THE
LAST ROUNDUP
ENDGAME
PLAN
DEPARTMENT
of HOMELAND SECURITY
(DHS)…IMMIGRATION and
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
(ICE)
ENDGAME
PLAN
Office
of Detention and Strategic Removal
2003-2012
Detention
& Removal For a Secure
Homeland
LINK
BELOW:
scroll 3 pages to top
when document
appears
This
Official
Department
of Homeland Security

Document
[this DHS/ICE
document has full color
charts/diagrams]
has been painstakingly
turned into webpages, as files have a way of
disappearing conveniently
at critical
times.
We all have known for
years the New World Order had plans of doing
away with the PATRIOTS and the RESISTORS. What
you are about to read on these
pages is exactly HOW the
NWO plans to do
it.
I hope you are wise
enough to read, prepare, and heed this warning.
If you don’t, by the time you wake up and see
NATO troops and BLACKWATER goons
in the streets of your
Andy of Mayberry little town, it will be too
late.
( many
thanks to a Patriot Lady friend in Milwaukee who
expended many hours of her time to construct
this website at my urging
www.endgameplan.info
)
The Technocratic
Age
is slowly designing
an every day more controlled
society.
The society will be
dominated by an elite of persons free from
traditional values who will have no doubt
in fulfilling their
objectives by means of purged techniques with
which they will influence the behavior of
people and will control
and watch the society in all
details.
It will become possible
to exert a practically permanent
watch on each citizen of
the world

– –
Zbigniew
Brzezinski

[300ResisttheNewWorldOrder.jpg]
Advertisements

Responses

  1. so the 80 gonna hafta neutralize with extreme predjudice the 10……….plus a few russkies and chinks . so it is written. so shall it be

  2. It sounds pretty easy until you look at the stratego board.

    TT – the occupation
    * – space
    $ – funding
    @ -surveillance
    6 – chaos (the 80%)
    9 – the plan (authority)
    3 – wmd (event)

    how many plan for their death? few? even fewer plan for incarceration. one in thirty is or was imprisoned in this country. they have increased the prison gulag system in the US several times over since the 911 fraud. this does not include offshore locations for cuba, haiti and dominican..

    • WHOA WHOA WHOA just a minute ! This questionaire was part of someones doctoral thesis and was not a DOD generated doc. Of course I have been wrong before,and smokescreens have been used before. This questionaire is not used other than the time in Cali. as far as I know from scuttlebutt. As I have stated I have been wrong before. Talk to some fresh recruits or recently discharged to get the real story.

      • If so, do you remember when a doctoral thesis or any other research venture at a university did not get into the MIC system?

        Rhodes to the Pentagon. I certainly will concede the origination point as somewhere other than the DoD. Who needs the PR of DoD letterhead?

        What generates from Reuters and CNN may be right from NSA-Langley but the truth is never revealed.

  3. I don’t think it sounds easy but I do think it sounds doable. The odds are there are many others in the machine that feel the same way and are biding their time until the SHTF. Guys that have command of those wmd that they intend to use on the american people. I also think if things get as bad as we suspect, that the majority of those citizens that possess all those weapons they intend to confiscate won’t go down without a fight, taking a bunch of the bastards that checked yes on question #46 with them. They better fear for their lives as well. As should the foreign troops, fighting for what exactly?

    I keep thinking about Smedley Butler and how he led the fascists to believe he was down with their plan until he went and upset the apple cart on the bastards.

    While there are still so many brain dead amerikans that still think my country right or wrong, there is a larger, growing number that are pissed off and ready to push back.

    If those that rule are truly nothing more than sick psychopaths, they shouldn’t be that hard to fool because they think they’ve gotten everything under their control and wrapped up in their favor.

    Maybe they’re wrong. Maybe they don’t. Their hubris may be their undoing.

    • The Real ID venture is about predictive measures. It’s all data-mining now and targeted

      .gov/gangstalking/(enter your name here)

      No Snowblowers needed!

  4. http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/obamas-dhs-seizing-local-power/

    Puddy, check starsandstripes4….

    • One of the VIPR purposes lays out the need for [Enhance] agency resources during “special events” which like a superbowl or a staged event in Boston no longer has a delineation. We should understand they are all staged events even down to the wars since Gulf War I.

      The visual PRESENCE of the Vipr is the most important aspect of the program, IMO. Where the reality is in the program is that it offers the ancillary authorities for use outside of the staging area. The insiders of DHS/TSA are the stagers, directors and assistants to the producers of reality Amerika.

      We’ve seen the EO laundry list from Ronnie to Barry. Piece by piece and line by line like a massive script for an epic conclusion. The devils in the details = true.

  5. “The last roundup” tee hee, thats a good way of putting it. Sheep can be rounded up, but wolverines ????

    • The sheep are forced labor, the wolverines may be re-educated to watch over the shearing of the flocks or inducted into the blue helmets. If not they would likely be dismissed and terminated. (Logic?)


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: