Posted by: hybridrogue1 | January 25, 2013


Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you the most eloquently written conspiracy theory in the history of the nation and this world, The Declaration of Independence:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

. . . . . . . . . . . .



  1. By liberals, I simply mean those people who accept big government as a given, regardless of their political affiliation.
    For them, big, bigger, and biggest government is a rock-bottom assumption that requires no thought. The sun comes up every morning, and there is big government.
    This assumption supersedes anything written in the US Constitution explicitly limiting the power of central authority.
    Where there is conflict between that document and the actions of government, the Constitution automatically takes a back seat. It is looked upon as a primitive, ancient, and worn-out set of ideas.

    In their eyes, they are working with reality, whereas Constitutionalists have a quirky and disturbing obsession that clings to absolute Principle.”
    –John Rappoprt


  2. Louis Fisher worked for four decades at the Library of Congress as Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers for the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress.


    Fisher, presents historic and constitutional arguments against the increasing usurpation by the president of war-making powers. Harry Truman set the modern precedent for circumventing congressional war powers by using United Nations authority to sidestep the Constitution during the Korean War. Dwight Eisenhower continued Truman’s approach in covert government activities. With shocking ease, according to the author, subsequent presidents have continued this virtual presidential confiscation of the war powers. Fisher argues that they have done so by actions that violate both the letter and spirit of the Constitution. In an era of presidential temptation to increase popularity through foreign ventures, this study addresses one of the most important constitutional issues facing American government. Its relevance, clarity, and brevity commend the book to the widest readership.

    No student of American politics or American foreign policy can plausibly claim to discuss the role of the executive branch in military/foreign policy without having digested Fisher’s book.

    The criticism of the War Powers Act is very powerful, and needs to be understood more broadly in America. The unconstitutionality of the act is one reason it is never seriously invoked by the President or insisted upon by Congress, yet many people still refer to it as the crux for understanding the war powers balance between the Presidency and the Congress.


    The only book that develops constitutional law in the comprehensive sense, American Constitutional Law not only contains the results of court decisions but also highlights the efforts of legislatures, executives, the states, and the general public. .
    Most constitutional law books focus only on case law and judicial pronouncements, but American Constitutional Law illustrates how both judicial and non-judicial forces shape constitutional law. Compared to other texts, this book offers more citations to earlier decisions, allowing the reader to research areas in greater depth and better understand the process of trial and error used to shape constitutional principles. A broad range of cases (not just landmark cases) is combined with nonjudicial contributions. Fisher and Adler also cover state involvement in constitutional law by offering examples of how states, by interpreting their own constitutions, may depart from Supreme Court doctrines. Readings include not only court cases, but presidential statements and congressional debates.

  3. “These events have confirmed Patrick Henry’s warning that secrecy in government is an “abomination”; it is a main instrument in the corruption and arrogation of power. If the nation has not learned that lesson from the secret escalation in Vietnam, from the bold attempt to corrupt the electoral process that surfaced in Watergate, it is unteachable.”~Raoul Berger, 1974

    This book in tandem with; PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWER, by Louis Fisher, has all of the historical and textual information needed to successfully argue that the present system is utterly Ultra Vires [beyond law] and totally illegitimate.

    Raoul Berger (1901 – 2000) was an attorney and professor at The University of California at Berkeley and Harvard University School of Law. While at Harvard, he was the Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History.
    His publications include:

    >Congress v. The Supreme Court (1969) ISBN 978-0-674-16210-5
    >Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems (1972) ISBN 978-0-674-44475-1
    >Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth (1974) ISBN 978-0-674-27425-9
    >Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment (1975) ISBN 978-0-674-35795-2
    >Death Penalties: The Supreme Court’s Obstacle Course (1982) ISBN 978-0-674-19426-7
    >Federalism: The Founders’ Design (1987) ISBN 978-0-8061-2059-1
    >Selected Writings on the Constitution (1987) [with Philip Kurland] ISBN 978-0-940973-00-8
    >The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (1989) ISBN 978-0-8061-2186-4

    Berger was a popular academic critic of the doctrine of “executive privilege” and was viewed as playing a significant role in undermining President Richard Nixon’s constitutional arguments during the impeachment process.
    Berger unleashed a firestorm of controversy within the legal academy with his next book, Government by Judiciary. In it, Berger demonstrated the Warren Court’s expansive interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment as it alternately distorted and ignored the intentions of the framers of that amendment as disclosed by the historical record. Berger further drew down heat by presenting arguments that the framers of the Fourteenth

    Amendment did not intend it to forbid segregated schooling.

    Berger further posited that the Warren Court expanded the authority of the judiciary without constitutional warrant.

    Sep 28, 2000 · Raoul Berger, a widely read and widely debated authority on the United States Constitution, died on Saturday at his home in Concord, Mass.


  4. Some things are timeless Willy. Such are these words and their deeds. The matter may change over time but the energy is the same forever.

    1-2-4-5-7-8 = ∞
    3 9 6 = ^

      
      
     
       

  5. China “Sinks” US Aircraft Carrier During War Game

    Game alright… They’ll be landing troops on the west coast shore on US carriers.

  6. Africa: Is Africa New Al-Qaeda Launch Pad? Experts Say Global Threat Emerging

    As if we weren’t predicting the rape of Africa as the final frontier. AL CIADA knows.

  7. Ive just ‘liked’ after reading the very first sentence….I mean, whats not to like about such a powerful, eloquent , and ” christ if that doesnt sound just right”!! Ok, reading on….

  8. ( why yes I do find it significant, the 13 states.)

    • The 13 states, were derived from the 13 colonies. And these were 13 corporate charters. And this is all numerical fandango to do with the New Atlantis – and hardly anyone on the ground in that era had any idea of the destiny planned for the ‘New World’ at that time.

      And we must admit with mittens on that the design for the New Atlantis could only HOPE to be fulfilled by the authors. “Best laid plans of mice and men” … and all that. So much for Bacon and eggs…


      • Atlantis has all the fandango in the 3D world to do with numerology…thats’ like breathing!

        “In Kritias, Plato wrote that the numbers 5 and 6 were sacred in Atlantis, where they were encoded in architecture, art, and ceremonial life ‘to honor the odd and even days.’ The Atlanteans’ choice of these numerals reflects their holistic religion, the ‘Navel of the World,’ whose adherents strove for spiritual synthesis and balance. The number 5 represents the male principle of conscious outward action, while 6 stands for female intuitive receptivity.”

        Frank Joseph, “The Atlantis Encyclopedia” (206)

  9. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. WHA?

    • Niki, There is no doubt that there were hypocritical attitudes dwelling within the souls of some of these men who broke from Britain. But there is still truth to this charge, as both sides in the conflict would make allegiances with various Indian tribes who were also warring with one another.

      Let it not be forgotten that the Europeans essentially stole Turtle Island from the Native Peoples. But let us also keep in mind that the native people here made war against one another in tribal disputes, that they were as cruel as any other peoples when it came to the treatment of their enemies.

      Let us not Idealize either the Native Americans, nor the Founders of the new nation, but rather look to the Principles that are self evidently true, and that are our only saving grace as a safeguard against tyrannical government.


      • THe Pilgrim Pride? The British Dutch East India Co.? John Adams was physically ill dealing with them, just as we deal with the left-right.

        How do you fight a war? How do you win a battle? We haven’t won one since we were a colony. The Bankers see no difference in debt versus death. It all pays off on the ledger.

        • Whether we win or loose, it is in the righteousness of the battle that we ‘win’ as those who would defend Liberty.

          Nobody lives forever…I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.


          • Or, as Jimmy Cliff would say, “I’d rather be a free man in my grave…………………..than be livin’ as a puppet or a slave”

            i am just in awe of the simplicity and potential of these six humble words: “Alter..abolish”, “Right, duty, throw off”

            • Absolutely camusrebel,

              Those who comprehend their rights understand those six humble words…they are written in bright light in our consciousness.

              I have asked this simple question now going on two separate threads at T+S, and none of the opposition has made even an attempt at an answer:

              > Do you believe that the “federal government” is acting on legitimate authority?

              > If so from where does this authority derive?


              • > Do you believe that the “federal government” is acting on legitimate authority? FUCK NO!!!!!!!

                • Now that Niki, is the bold and assertive answer I seek from these slick squirming snakes…Lol


                  • I apologize for its untimely Nature heheheh❤

                    • Don’t you apologize fer nuthin or I’ll kick your ass.


                    • I am such a thug😉 ❤

                • No and they know it. What’s important about this Sandy Hook to WOT is that it will indicate whether they are working an i-distraction or are they legitimately moving a fascist agenda. Obamacare is more than health care. It’s e-mpirecare. Massive psyopportunity.


            • turn it up to eleven, get up, maybe take a nice toke, find the groove, BE the groove (clothing optional)

        • You win a war by not engaging in it! Puddy I need to apologise for being abusive to a guest here. its not my place . I should have liked to have taken it outside but I weakened. I am sorry! To you, that is.

          • I missed it. I just listened to CR’s version ‘harder they fall’ and that’s the approach I take to the sheeple, shills and spikes. Power up girl, you are doing good.

            • aw shucks thanks PD!❤

  10. Economic Warfare consists of destabilizing the economies of sovereign countries and impoverishing their respective populations.

    On Black Monday, September 29, 2008 the US was destabilized by the Federal Government of the United States itself.

    Those who do not recognize who is at war against the people of this nation, who still defend and apologize for this despotic so-called “government” are traitors to their very own interests.


  11. Will, I went to T&S and read Craig’s article and the comments and was posting a very elaborate one of my own when my computer just “jumped” and took me off the page and I lost the entire post.

    BUT>.. I get email notifications on certain posts from James Tracy’s Memory Hole and just read this really interesting comment regarding the shell casings and guns.. a point I have not seen mentioned before It’s posted by someone identified as drrjp:

    in response to James:

    Updated January 26, 2013 The following timeline of the December 14 mass killing of 20 children and 8 adults in Newtown Connecticut attempts to demonstrate how the event was presented to the public by corporate news media. The chronological assemblage of coverage is not comprehensive of all reports published on the incident but rather seeks […]




    The first report of the incident was an interruption to normal broadcasting. The very first verifiable piece of physical
    evidence reported by the media doing the breaking news was that “.223 caliber casings were found on the floor.”

    NOT an assault rifle. NOT an AR-15. Not a Bushmaster AR-15. But .223 caliber casings that are almost identical to 5.56
    NATO rounds used all over the world. I have watched eough crime reporting to onow that the ONLY time bullet casings are
    reported are when there are no victims or bullets found at the scene.

    Not even a report about blood. Why?

    They had already decided, beforehand, that they would blame an AR-15, and not just any brand but a Bushmaster brand AR-15 so
    that they could issue a specific ban on it. Why Bushmaster?

    For the same reason you report McDonalds. You go after the country’s largest maker of what you want to ban.

    The presence of .223 casings – with no mention if they were even fired recently – became the most pressing fact of what

    was supposed to be a horrific mass murder of little kids.

    NEXT came the announcement of a “GLOCK and a semi-automatic 9mm” found at the scene. AGAIN, if GLOCK is not the largest

    manufacturer of handguns in the world, it is the most well-known. It is repeated on TV as if no other guns are like

    it. Except that GLOCKs are “semi-automatic” and fire every handgun round including the most popular, “9mm.” This is like

    saying, “WE found a PRIUS at the scene along with a compact 4-door electric hybrid.”

    Later on, we heard that the “semi-automatic 9mm” was a Sig-Sauer “semi-automatic 9mm” and that the GLOCK was also a

    “semi-automatic 9mm,” in addition to the Bushmaster AR-15 – which was not in the school but in the locked trunk of Lanza’s


    When they opened the trunk, they saw a shotgun and started clearing it of rounds instead of checking the safety and

    sealing it in a bag or box for evidence. We would subsequently learn that NO AR-15 was found nor ANY OTHER WEAPON capable of

    firing .223 rounds. If they found 7.62 caliber casings on the floor, would they immediately blame an AK-47, despite the

    seven different sizes of a 7.62 casing?

    Finally, the last word on weapons found were FOUR handguns, NO assault rifle. But, the government and media were still well

    into their blitz on assault rifles. Four handguns with ten-round magazines each makes firing forty bullets easier

    than having to reload an assault rifle with a seond 30-round magazine.

    BUT, H. Wayne Carver, the alleged experienced coroner, with over 35 years of experience, claimed that all children were

    shot with the “long gun” which, of course, did not exist.


    Sure sounds like a Media conspiracy theory to me, who cannot get their lies straight.

    Ask ANY State Prosecutor if he or she would have enough forensic evidence to charge anyone with anything, let alone 28 murders.


    And speaking of casings, if there were “EAR-witness reports” or “hjundreds of shots being fired,” then why were no 9mm

    casings found on the floor? The guns identify what caliber they use, so one does not need a casing to identify it.

    Yet, the floor is filled with .223 casings – cooroborating the lying coroner’s report – but not a single 9mm casing or spent

    shell was found at the scene?

    You would think that with all their gun-brand specificity, they would have announced the brand of the ammo as well.

    Except that this might give away the name of the government contractor whosupplied 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammo

    to all of their departments, including NOAA, NASA, Social Security, Medicaid, and the bulk going to FEMA – not DHS

    “Curiouser and curiouser,” said Alice in Wonderland.

    • Deb,

      Thanks for the comment from Tracy’s site. Yes the official story is just a kaleidoscopic of flashing light and color, a spin of dissonance.

      To start the disarmament of the people by outlawing in most effective defensive weaponry is too obvious agenda. That anyone is confused as to the intent of this despotic “government” is beyond my comprehension – other than I understand the brainwashing they have been through and that they are living in a delusional wonderland. Their brains have been spun to cotton-candy.

      The near future looks ‘interesting’ in that old Chinese curse way.


      • and further elicits the obvious. There should be no contention on the hoax but purpose for this poorly staged psyop and why they think we are so foolish as not to look beyond the pimple and at the nose, at large.

        I can’t conclude anything else but data-mining and highly sophisticated computational reduction and data-mining operation. It’s not so much 2nd amendment as FS surveillance and identification. The Traveling Salesman scenario, is my guess.

        • Yes, I think that it is interesting that the West Point study on the definition of “the Domestic Enemy” was issued in the time period leading up to the SH event.

          SH is like “Calling all Domestic Enemies…sign up here”

          But dood, we are already signed up and don’t even have to sit on the ‘Waiting List’…I think front row tables is our delight. It’ll be the Best Selling Show.

          Deb and Nikki – compose in your word doc program – copy and paste that to where you wish to post on a blog…make a habit of it, and your will live a less disturbing web life…like content leetle shpiders…ja?

          • Yes that does sound like the way to go , although less exciting somehow.

          • Thanks Will, good advice. I’ll try to do that next time I’m posting a long diatribe😉

            • Hahha YES Jg Ive said it before , weve some similiarities so far..My online presence is known as the Hun…coined for me by me, implying I may be appear as a small avatar, but I carry a big stick!!

  12. “Will, I went to T&S and read Craig’s article and the comments and was posting a very elaborate one of my own when my computer just “jumped” and took me off the page and I lost the entire post.” nightmare. happens all the time to me…quite frequently …disturbing…!

    • Niki, you too, or were you commenting that it happens to you as well?


      • It happens to me so much I want to cry. It comes like a plannes sneak attack at my most important or crucial moments, zzaap. Gone. And at that point I dont what it takes to go on. I walk away to avoid further digital madness and any more inhuman yowls of frustration from my inner most being.

  13. lol… I couldn’t have expressed my frustration any better dawn! It’s maddening to lose a very long post that way. Sometimes I will repost but the words never seem as eloquent as the first time, dammit! and others, when I’m just too tired to type it all out again, i’ll just let it go and step away from the computer ……….

    • Yup.tis a tragedy! And a niggling feeling that it isnt coincidence, not by a person but more like a bug targeted at a site or maybe individual ” Chip! (Croaks Janet,) Send the WebAnnnoyance script to Coto Crew, no, not the BigBlank or TurboTrollTime, just the usual This BrowserInterface&YourDevicesFuckingHateYou.. Ya, that will teach them to accurately post about things that help bring about change for humanity/earth!!’

  14. Mass Shootings in the United States Since 2005 –The Brady Campaign

    “Newtown, CT December 14, 2012
    26 people were shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School, a K-4th grade school. 24-year-old Ryan Lanza, whose mother was one of the victims and employed by the school, was the lone gunman. Twenty young students and six adults at the school died. (26 Dead at Newtown School, NBC, December 14, 2012).”~The Brady Campaign

    This is a list of “mass shootings” 65 pages long. One might wonder how accurate the rest of the summations are here.


  15. .I still think it worth a ponder, something I was thinking at the beginning of the “news cycle” on the Sandy Hook incident; There may have been a huge glitch in this operation.

    One may recall that there had been reports of Ryan Lanza’s girlfriend being “missing”, there were also reports that his father had been killed. This leads me to wonder if both Ryan and his brother Adam were being set up as shooters.

    The first reports of Ryan as being found dead at the school may have come from an earlier script, one in-which Ryan had been successfully abducted and his father killed. However the girlfriend story fits-in would probably be revealed if the original plan had worked out.

    It is only Ryan who has suggested that “perhaps” his ID was on Adam at the scene. No mention has ever been made of what this particular ID was, a drivers licence? a school ID?
    What? It is all left in the oh-zone…along with the rest of the kaleidoscopic wonder-wheel this story is.

    Keep in mind, I am not suggesting there is any solid proof, nor asserting this is what really happened. I am just looking at all the pieces of this puzzle and attempting to fit in all of the anomalies into a coherent form.


  16. The Syndicate in DC has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of their Protection and waging War against us.


  17. “but if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow…” ~Lennon


  18. Reposting from Truth and Shadows:

    On the topic of Sandy Hook, I will reprise the gist of something I spoke to earlier high above in this thread:

    I spoke to the question of what our interest in the event is, that is the ‘why’ we should be interested in it.

    I began with the keystones of investigative research, which are again:

    To determine the meaning of any event these are the proximate tools;
    MO – Motive – Cui Bono – and just as important; recognition of the actual milieu, or state of affairs the event took place within.

    Again, rather than address the particulars of Newtown, but to address the general process of discovery, I will note that the prime difficulty seems to be in assessing the last of the four points I mention above; the actual state of affairs that the incident took place in. This question is in fact what took up the majority of the thread [to the chagrin of many]. It is just as essential as the other three keystones, and more important in the sense of awareness of where we stand in general.

    That this event occurred in a draconian police state is far from incidental. That those so ready to hand-wave the evidence that it was a false flag are the same as those who refuse to face the fact that this is a draconian police state is no less coincidental and in fact the deep intertwining factor connecting the two combined opinions.

    It was my lack of success in getting Mr Hufferd to acknowledge this fact of the current police state that motivated my remarks of, FEBRUARY 14, 2013 – 12:08 PM.

    The reason for this present post is to illustrate that every word I put to this thread was indeed relevant to the issue of the Sandy Hook event. Deep State Events require deep investigation, beginning with the true nature of the State.


  19. FEBRUARY 14, 2013 – 12:08 PM
    “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
    ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

    Any social theory that does not take into account Social Engineering, will be fatally flawed.
    Dismissing the fact that the manufacture of consent is a proven phenomena of modern systems founded in public relations regimes leads invariably to preposterous analysis.

    This idea that any sort of democratic process can work. when that process is truncated at the very core, is based on such preposterous analysis. It takes a determined insistence on delusional pretense to remain so gullible; and this determination is the product of the conditioning and programming of the postmodern technocratic states.

    For those who haven’t studied and grasped the work of Bernays, and Lippmann and their school of progressive PR, nor the effects of watching television, can have no immunity to such scientifically calibrated persuasion.

    This thread is testament of the futility of attempting to break through such programming by simply making reasonable arguments. Such reason is dismissed by the emotions of the programmed automatons that make up the vast majority of modern societies.

    I would like to thank my prime opponent here for making such a perfect example of the ‘Programmed Automaton’ that I speak of. And I want to applaud such readers who are able to take away the positive lessons from this exchange. There is some growing portion of humanity that is awakening, and I hope this thread has contributed some little bit to that.

    W. Whitten – \\][//

  20. FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 9:57 PM
    For the benefit of the readers, let me expand just a bit on the answer given the quesiton of FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 6:55 PM from Hufferd and cited therein:

    The presumed dilemma that Hufferd puts to the forum is only applicable to the pure democracy that he ludicrously believes this republic to be.

    Yes, in a pure democracy the majority would rule, and any disputes made by the minority would be seen as an attempt to hamstring the government from putting into action the majority decisions.

    That dilemma is bypassed in a republic where the minority has the rights of Liberty, one of which is the right to dispute and overcome majority decisions when those decisions infringe upon the rights of Liberty.

    Thus the ‘dilemma’ proposed by Hufferd is merely the product of his confused and fevered thinking. As much as he wishes that this nation and it’s Constitution codifies democracy and majority rule, the fact is that the Constitution put in place a republican form of government that protects the rights of Liberty, and thus Justice for all.

    That this is not what is in place today, it is not due to law, it is due to systemic criminal actions putting illegitimate laws and practicing illegal enforcement of them. It is a criminal state. The Constitution and the republic it founded has been cast aside by the criminal cabal, and tyranny has been put in its place.

    The real Dilemma is the Enchantment of the deluded mass of the People. Hufferd being a prime example of that state of delusion.


  21. On FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 3:13 PM – Hufferd asks:

    > “Rogu, So, what happens if “the whole people” don’t all think alike and you don’t gunanimity on a decision (which will, in fact, be the case 100% of the time)? Nothing? No decision and the majority is stymied by the tyranny of the minority? You can’t be serious in rejecting majority rule!”~Huff’n’Puff Man
    . . . . . .
    Huffer, The great weight of the solid bone of your head must cause tremendous pain to your neck and shoulders.

    This question is nonsensical in a republic. It is based on the assumption that decision is based on majority opinion alone. All decisions are based on LAW in a republic Huffer, not on the fickle fiat of the majority. Every law and statute in this republic MUST comport with the Constitution or it is null and void.

    Merely posing the question above Hufferd, proves how dreadfully ignorant you are of the laws and history of this nation.

    It also proves that you are utterly unaware of the real Tyranny at hand, that of a totally illegitimate Criminal Cabal ruling by diktat and imposing a draconian police state.


  22. FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 3:21 PM
    To Hufferd,

    Your pleas are predicated on a hope of short memories and are dedicated to those you hope may not have read the entire scope of the dialog upon this page.

    So again:

    Over 500 posts later, you are still chattering and dancing around the edges of the central points, which you avoid by all of this chit-chat about trivial issues.

    Those central points are:

    You still advocate the disarming of the People in face of Tyrannical Oppression by an Illegitimate “government”.

    You still insist that Majority Rule can remove the right of the People to keep and bear arms, despite the fact that such rights are the Law of the Land.

    You cite ‘Practices’ as precedent, even though illegal practice cannot and never has created legitimate law.

    You argue that reasonably proven facts are not so simply because of your own personal opinion. And you make such arguments to the point of glaring absurdity, and are offended when it is pointed out that your arguments are preposterous.


  23. One FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 1:08 PM – Hufferd asserts this bald faced lie:

    > “You simply do not believe in “government of the people, by the people and for the people.”
    . . . . . . .
    I have stated herein on no uncertain terms, that the sovereignty belongs to The People.
    I have pointed out that this means the WHOLE OF THE PEOPLE, and not simply the majority of them, and that certain rights are inviolable, irrevocable, and inalienable; and that the majority is bound by the principles of Liberty not to infringe upon these rights.

    On this very page, time and again I have made this argument. To claim that I have not is a lie – to make the charge above is false witness because you know otherwise than what you just asserted.

    Your’s Hufferd, are the acts and words of a scoundrel, a disingenuous thief of the truth.


  24. FEBRUARY 13, 2013 – 10:26 AM – Hufferd says:
    >”Jeffersonian Democracy is a term older than your great, great, great grandfather. They always could have been mistaken back then, though.”
    . . . . . .
    As the term “Jeffersonian Democracy” itself in no manner whatsoever alters the republican form of government established constitutionally, I would take no particular offence to it.
    It is however the ensuing history beyond that, and reaching the 20th century with the machinations controlling the Wilson regime; with the new “scientific” form of Propaganda developed by those such as Bernays and Lippmann, that causes the harm that has led to the destruction of the republic.

    The central thesis of Bernaysian PR is the ‘manufacture of Consent’. By this ploy, a pure democracy, unbound by the restrictions on the majority in the republic established by the Constitution; the people become the tool of the elite. The people come to believe that the rule of the majority is lawful and proper and call a republic a “democracy” in ignorance.
    In this situation the term “democracy” is no longer some innocent colloquial phrase, but a critical error of thinking that has in fact led to the despotic rule of the elites who designed this facade.

    The majority of people simply do not understand what freedom promises, entails, and especially requires. They do not know the history of this country, or their own history–and knowing neither they cannot read and apply the Constitution intelligently.

    And one historical note on this that holds bearing:

    The Jeffersonian party was officially the “Republican Party”
    – (although historians later called it the Democratic-Republican Party.
    ~Noble E. Cunningham, The Jeffersonian party to 1801: a study of the formation of a party organization (1952)


  25. FEBRUARY 15, 2013 – 12:20 AM

    A reminder Hufferd, this is your first post addressed specifically to me. You did not ask about anything I had said pertaining to Sandy Hook, you said this:

    James Hufferd – JANUARY 25, 2013 – 10:49 PM
    > “According to Jefferson, “the earth belongs always to the living generation.” Which means that the government is and does whatever the bulk of the people at the time want it to…”

    YOU were the one that set the tone and topic for the discussion that you now complain didn’t address the Sandy Hook event. Your porcine ululations to the contrary; I have addressed that in other commentary on both of the threads on this blog – putting as much or more as anyone else here to that topic.

    You chose me out in particular here Hufferd, because of your arrogant egoistic belief that as an “academic” and a “scholar” and ‘Doktar of Wisdom’ {Lol} that you could best me in debate by putting to work your disingenuous PR skills. But rather and instead, you proved your utter ignorance in constitutional law and the principles of Liberty that law is founded on.

    And now it is as clear as an azure sky of deepest summer that you intend to continue with your fools game with me. You have proven yourself a big fat ZERO Huffer. And if you continue to reiterate that, you are indeed a sublime fool.


  26. James Hufferd PhD, is perhaps the most disingenuous lying son-of-a-bitch I have ever encountered on the web; on par with Agent Albury Smith 9/11 shill.
    And certainly equal to that one eyed-jackass, Onebornfree.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: